Reaffirming the poverty of the stimulus argument: a reply to the replies
نویسندگان
چکیده
Lidz, Waxman, and Freedman [Lidz, J., Waxman, S., & Freedman, J. (2003). What infants know about syntax but couldn’t have learned: Evidence for syntactic structure at 18-months. Cognition, 89, B65–B73.] argue that acquisition of the syntactic and semantic properties of anaphoric one in English relies on innate knowledge within the learner. Several commentaries have now been published questioning this finding. We defend the original finding by identifying both empirical and logical flaws in the critiques. q 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
منابع مشابه
Radically Questioning the Principle of the Least Restrictive Alternative: A Reply to Nir Eyal; Comment on “Nudging by Shaming, Shaming by Nudging”
In his insightful editorial, Nir Eyal explores the connections between nudging and shaming. One upshot of his argument is that we should question the principle of the least restrictive alternative in public health and health policy. In this commentary, I maintain that Eyal’s argument undermines only a rather implausible version of the principle of the least restrictive alternative and I sketch ...
متن کاملSearching for arguments to support linguistic nativism1
This article is a reply to the foregoing responses to our Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments (Pullum and Scholz, this special volume, hereafter EASPA). We Þrst address certain philosophical themes that cut across all six responses.We correct the impression held by Lasnik andUriagereka (L&U) and Crain and Pietroski (C&P) that EASPA owes the reader an alternative theory of langu...
متن کاملHow to Critique a Published Article
Few replies get published. Many that do get published could be more effective. A reply can be effective only if it is published, readable, and credible. This article suggests guidelines for writing good replies. The guidelines begin with things to keep in mind—for example, that you might be wrong—and things to do before you begin to write. The latter include considering not responding, consider...
متن کاملPoverty of the Stimulus Arguments in Phonology
Recent discussions of Chomsky's poverty of the stimulus argument have focused on the empirical side of the argument to the exclusion of its conceptual and philosophical foundations in the general problem of induction (Hume, Goodman, etc.). Moreover, it has been claimed that there are no poverty of the stimulus arguments in phonology. Against these claims this article offers an example of a phon...
متن کاملConceptual closure in Anselm’s proof: reply to
This paper provides replies to the objections Tony Roark presented (Roark, T. 2003. ‘Conceptual closure in Anselm’s proof’, History and Philosophy of Logic 24) to my reconstruction of Anselm’s famous argument in the Proslogion (Klima, G. 2000. ‘Saint Anselm’s Proof: A Problem of Reference, Intentional Identity and Mutual Understanding’, in G. Holmström-Hintikka, Medieval Philosophy and Modern T...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004